Bên cạnh Phân tích bài essay về "The number of visitors in the UK" IELTS WRITING TASK 1 (table), IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn Phân tích"Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and the poorest members. to what extent do you agree or disagree?"IELTS WRITING TASK 2(Đề thi IELTS 11/10/2023)
I. Đề bài
Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and the poorest members. to what extent do you agree or disagree?
II. Kiến thức liên quan
IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn:
III. Phân tích
- Dạng opinion essay thì đã rất quen thuộc với các bạn học sinh lớp IELTS ONLINE WRITING 1 KÈM 1 của IELTS TUTOR rồi nhé
- Theo hướng Partly (Vừa ủng hộ quan điểm đề cho, vừa không ủng hộ) có thể tham khảo cách triển khai:
- Intro câu 2:
- Body 1: On the other hand, ý quan điểm đề cho không phủ nhận
- Main idea 1: Reducing income inequality can foster social cohesion by creating a sense of shared purpose and community.
- Supporting idea: When people perceive that the economic system is fair and that wealth is distributed more equitably, it can lead to greater social stability and a stronger sense of belonging.>> IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI 30/5/2020 IELTS WRITING TASK 2 (kèm bài sửa HS đạt 6.5)
- Example: Minnesota's strong commitment to social welfare programs has contributed to its low income inequality and fostered a sense of community and social cohesion.
- Main idea 2: Narrowing the wealth gap can lead to better access to healthcare, education, and other essential services for the less affluent members of society.
- Supporting idea: Improved health and education can contribute to individual well-being and overall societal happiness.
- Example: Massachusetts' relatively narrow wealth gap, high access to healthcare and education, and impressive life expectancy and educational attainment are attributed to its commitment to universal healthcare through MassHealth and a strong focus on accessible, quality education for all residents.
- Main idea 1: Reducing income inequality can foster social cohesion by creating a sense of shared purpose and community.
- Body 2: On the one hand, cũng có chỗ chưa đồng ý với quan điểm đề cho
- Main idea 1: Wealth inequality is necessary to provide economic incentives.
- Supporting idea: If everyone had similar incomes, there might be less motivation for individuals to work hard, innovate, and take risks. The prospect of accumulating wealth can be a powerful driver of economic growth.
- Example: The United States, one of the most economically prosperous but unequal countries in the developed world, owes its success in part to its free-market and capitalist system, which encourages entrepreneurship, investment, and competition, fostering economic incentives for hard work, innovation, and risk-taking.>> IELTS TUTOR có hướng dẫn kĩ PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI THẬT TASK 2 (dạng advantages & disadvantages) NGÀY 04/8/2020 IELTS WRITING GENERAL MÁY TÍNH (kèm bài được sửa hs đi thi)
- Main idea 2: Redistributive policies to reduce income inequality can be seen as infringing on individual freedom and property rights.
- Supporting idea: Critics argue that people should have the right to enjoy the fruits of their labor and that wealth redistribution may be unjust.
- Example: Progressive taxation, an example of a redistributive policy, aims to reduce income inequality by taxing the wealthy at a higher rate, but it faces criticism from those who consider it unfair, as it may be seen as penalizing success and infringing on individuals' right to enjoy the rewards of their labor.
- Main idea 1: Wealth inequality is necessary to provide economic incentives.
- Body 1: On the other hand, ý quan điểm đề cho không phủ nhận
- Intro câu 2:
IELTS TUTOR gợi ý bài tham khảo:
The debate over whether reducing income inequality is the best way to create a happier society is ongoing. While there are merits to this idea, I believe that addressing wealth disparities can contribute to societal well-being, but economic incentives and personal freedoms should also be considered.
On the one hand, reducing income inequality can foster social cohesion by promoting fairness. When people perceive that wealth is distributed more equitably, they are more likely to feel a sense of belonging and shared purpose, contributing to social stability. For instance, Minnesota’s commitment to social welfare has resulted in lower income inequality and greater community cohesion. Additionally, narrowing the wealth gap improves access to essential services like healthcare and education, which can enhance overall well-being. Massachusetts, with its emphasis on universal healthcare and education, exemplifies how a more equitable society can lead to higher life satisfaction.>> Form đăng kí giải đề thi thật IELTS 4 kĩ năng kèm bài giải bộ đề 100 đề PART 2 IELTS SPEAKING quý đang thi (update hàng tuần) từ IELTS TUTOR
On the other hand, wealth inequality can serve as a necessary economic incentive. If everyone earned similar incomes, individuals might be less motivated to work hard, innovate, and take risks, which are crucial drivers of economic growth. The United States, despite its wealth disparities, has benefited from a capitalist system that encourages entrepreneurship and competition. Furthermore, redistributive policies aimed at reducing inequality can be viewed as infringing on personal freedom. Progressive taxation, for example, is often criticized for penalizing success and restricting the right to enjoy the rewards of one’s efforts.
In conclusion, while reducing income inequality can promote social cohesion and access to services, maintaining some wealth inequality can provide the incentives necessary for economic growth and personal freedom.
Các khóa học IELTS online 1 kèm 1 - 100% cam kết đạt target 6.0 - 7.0 - 8.0
>> IELTS Intensive Writing - Sửa bài chi tiết
>> Thành tích học sinh IELTS TUTOR với hàng ngàn feedback được cập nhật hàng ngày
