Bên cạnh Phân tích bài essay về "The number of visitors in the UK" IELTS WRITING TASK 1 (table), IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn Phân tích"Some people believe that governments should make laws about people’s nutrition and food choice while others argue that it is their choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion."IELTS WRITING TASK 2 (đề thi 30/11/2023 computer-based)
I. Đề bài
Some people believe that governments should make laws about people’s nutrition and food choice while others argue that it is their choice. Discuss both views and give your opinion
II. Kiến thức liên quan
IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn:
Từ vựng topic UTOPIA đã được IELTS TUTOR tổng hợp
III. Phân tích
- Dạng discuss both views thì đã rất quen thuộc với các bạn học sinh lớp IELTS ONLINE WRITING 1 KÈM 1 của IELTS TUTOR rồi nhé
- Dạng discuss both views có thể bố cục bài như sau:
- Body 1: Viết về quan điểm Some people believe that governments should make laws about people’s nutrition and food choice
- Main idea 1: government intervention is necessary to address public health issues related to poor nutrition. >> IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI 30/5/2020 IELTS WRITING TASK 2 (kèm bài sửa HS đạt 6.5)
- Supporting idea:
- Unhealthy diets contribute to various health problems, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.
- Governments may see the regulation of certain food choices as a means to reduce the burden on healthcare systems and improve overall public health.
- Example: Several countries, including Mexico, the United Kingdom, and South Africa, have implemented taxes on sugary drinks to discourage consumption and reduce sugar intake. Studies have shown these taxes can lead to a decrease in sugary drink purchases, potentially contributing to lower obesity rates.
- Supporting idea:
- Main idea 2: Relying solely on providing information and education to the public may not be sufficient.
- Supporting idea: Regulation can set clear standards and guidelines for food production, labeling, and marketing, ensuring that consumers are not misled about the nutritional content of products.
- Example: Denmark implemented a tax on saturated fat in processed foods, leading to a significant reduction in consumption of these products and a subsequent decrease in obesity rates.
- Main idea 1: government intervention is necessary to address public health issues related to poor nutrition. >> IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI 30/5/2020 IELTS WRITING TASK 2 (kèm bài sửa HS đạt 6.5)
- Body 2: Viết về quan điểm others argue that it is their choice & nêu rõ mình ủng hộ quan điểm này
- Main idea 1: Limiting personal food choices is seen as an infringement on individual autonomy.>> IELTS TUTOR có hướng dẫn kĩ PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI THẬT TASK 2 (dạng advantages & disadvantages) NGÀY 04/8/2020 IELTS WRITING GENERAL MÁY TÍNH (kèm bài được sửa hs đi thi)
- Supporting idea: People have the right to make their own choices about what they eat without government interference.
- Example: France's ban on sugary drinks in schools faced criticism for potentially infringing on the autonomy of teenagers and neglecting broader education about healthy choices.
- Main idea 2: Excessive regulation can be a form of paternalism, where the government assumes a parental role by making decisions on behalf of individuals.
- Supporting idea: This approach may be seen as intrusive, and there are concerns about the potential for overreach into personal lives and choices.
- Example: Singapore's chewing gum ban: This longstanding ban has been criticized as paternalistic and unnecessary, restricting individual freedom for minimal public health benefit.
- Main idea 1: Limiting personal food choices is seen as an infringement on individual autonomy.>> IELTS TUTOR có hướng dẫn kĩ PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI THẬT TASK 2 (dạng advantages & disadvantages) NGÀY 04/8/2020 IELTS WRITING GENERAL MÁY TÍNH (kèm bài được sửa hs đi thi)
- Body 1: Viết về quan điểm Some people believe that governments should make laws about people’s nutrition and food choice
IELTS TUTOR gợi ý bài tham khảo:
The debate over whether governments should regulate people's nutrition and food choices or leave these decisions to individuals is contentious. While some argue that government intervention is necessary to address public health issues, I do believe that such regulations infringe on personal freedom and autonomy.
On the one hand, proponents of government regulation assert that it is essential to tackle public health issues stemming from poor nutrition. Firstly, unhealthy diets are linked to various health problems, including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Governments can mitigate these issues by regulating food choices to reduce the healthcare system's burden and enhance public health. For instance, several countries, including Mexico, the United Kingdom, and South Africa, have implemented taxes on sugary drinks. These measures aim to discourage consumption and lower sugar intake, and studies have indicated a decline in sugary drink purchases, potentially contributing to reduced obesity rates. Additionally, relying solely on education and information may not suffice; regulation can establish clear standards for food production, labeling, and marketing, ensuring consumers are not misled about nutritional content. Denmark’s tax on saturated fat in processed foods led to a significant drop in consumption of these products and a subsequent decrease in obesity rates.>> IELTS TUTOR có hướng dẫn kĩ PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI THẬT TASK 2 (dạng advantages & disadvantages) NGÀY 04/8/2020 IELTS WRITING GENERAL MÁY TÍNH (kèm bài được sửa hs đi thi)
On the other hand, opponents, myself included, argue that food choices should remain a personal decision, emphasizing individual autonomy. They believe people have the right to decide what they consume without government interference. For example, France's ban on sugary drinks in schools faced criticism for possibly infringing on teenagers' autonomy and neglecting broader educational efforts on healthy choices. Furthermore, excessive regulation can be perceived as paternalistic, with the government assuming a parental role in decision-making for individuals. This approach is seen as intrusive and raises concerns about potential overreach into personal lives. Singapore’s longstanding ban on chewing gum has been criticized as paternalistic and unnecessary, restricting individual freedom for minimal public health benefits.
In conclusion, while government intervention in nutrition and food choices can address public health issues, I am of the opinion that it also raises concerns about personal freedom and autonomy.
Các khóa học IELTS online 1 kèm 1 - 100% cam kết đạt target 6.0 - 7.0 - 8.0
>> IELTS Intensive Writing - Sửa bài chi tiết
>> Thành tích học sinh IELTS TUTOR với hàng ngàn feedback được cập nhật hàng ngày