Bên cạnh HƯỚNG DẪN TỪNG BƯỚC CÁCH LÀM BÀI TẬP MẪU IELTS READING DẠNG FILL IN THE GAP, IELTS TUTOR Giải đề"Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture. Others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion." IELTS WRITING TASK 2
I. Đề bài
Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture. Others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
II. Từ vựng
III. Phân tích
- Dạng discuss both views thì đã rất quen thuộc với các bạn học sinh lớp IELTS ONLINE WRITING 1 KÈM 1 của IELTS TUTOR rồi nhé
- Dạng discuss both views có thể bố cục bài như sau:
- Body 1: Viết về quan điểm Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture.
- Main idea 1: Critics argue that government resources should be allocated to more pressing issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
- Supporting idea: They believe that funding cultural activities diverts resources away from essential services.
- Example: In the United Kingdom, there's an ongoing debate about government funding for the National Theatre, with some critics advocating for prioritizing spending on essential services like healthcare and education, viewing the theatre as an unaffordable luxury>> IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn PHÂN TÍCH ĐỀ THI 30/5/2020 IELTS WRITING TASK 2 (kèm bài sửa HS đạt 6.5)
- Main idea 2: Determining what constitutes "art" and "culture" can be subjective, and some people may not agree with the government's choices.
- Supporting idea: There is a risk of favoritism or political bias in funding decisions.
- Example: In the United States, the debate over the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) centers on whether it should fund certain types of art or avoid censorship. Some argue for funding only "wholesome" and "patriotic" art, whereas others advocate for a diverse range of art, even if it's controversial. This reflects the broader discussion about government's role in arts funding and what kind of art it should support.
- Main idea 1: Critics argue that government resources should be allocated to more pressing issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
- Body 2: Viết về quan điểm Others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. & nêu rõ mình ủng hộ quan điểm này
- Main idea 1: (Viết về beneficial for the population) Cultural activities, such as museums, festivals, and theaters, can stimulate tourism and local economies.
- Supporting idea: Investment in culture can lead to increased job opportunities and economic growth.
- Example: The Edinburgh Fringe Festival, held annually in Scotland, is a renowned arts event drawing over 50,000 performers and 3 million visitors, contributing over £100 million in revenue to the city and generating numerous jobs
- Main idea 2: (Viết về beneficial for the culture) Art and culture are integral parts of a nation's heritage and identity.
- Supporting idea: Government funding helps preserve and showcase cultural heritage for future generations.
- Example: The Acropolis in Athens, Greece, a UNESCO World Heritage Site and global symbol of Greek culture, has received substantial government investment in its preservation, restoration, and educational programs. This commitment has safeguarded this cultural treasure, ensuring its legacy for generations to come, while also making it a thriving cultural hub that continues to captivate and educate people worldwide.
- Main idea 1: (Viết về beneficial for the population) Cultural activities, such as museums, festivals, and theaters, can stimulate tourism and local economies.
- Body 1: Viết về quan điểm Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture.
Tham khảo thêm cách viết Body 2 triển khai theo hướng khác với 1 main idea nhé:
- On the other hand, I do believe that allocating government budget to creative expressions and the cultural realm is worthwhile because it can boost the national economy. Indeed, aesthetic expressions like films draw in tourists who contribute to the local economy by spending on tickets, accommodations, dining, and various local services. Take, for instance, an internationally renowned film festival held in a picturesque town, where this annual event showcases a wide array of films, drawing cinephiles and filmmakers from around the world. Consequently, tourists converge on the town, acquiring tickets for film screenings, reserving accommodations in local hotels and Airbnb rentals, relishing meals at nearby restaurants, and even exploring the attractions in the vicinity
IELTS TUTOR gợi ý bài tham khảo:
Some people argue that government funding should not be used for art and culture, while others believe such investment is essential for societal and cultural growth. I agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, critics argue that government resources should be prioritized for more pressing issues like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. They contend that diverting funds to cultural activities neglects essential public services, which directly impact citizens’ quality of life. For instance, in the United Kingdom, debates persist over funding the National Theatre, with some advocating for reallocating funds to vital sectors like healthcare and education, deeming the arts an unaffordable luxury. Furthermore, determining what constitutes “art” and “culture” is often subjective, leading to potential favoritism or political bias in funding decisions. In the United States, for example, controversies surrounding the National Endowment for the Arts highlight differing opinions on whether government funding should support only “patriotic” art or include more diverse and even controversial expressions.>> Form đăng kí giải đề thi thật IELTS 4 kĩ năng kèm bài giải bộ đề 100 đề PART 2 IELTS SPEAKING quý đang thi (update hàng tuần) từ IELTS TUTOR
On the other hand, others, myself included, believe that investing in cultural activities yields significant benefits for both the population and the culture. Cultural events such as festivals and museums stimulate tourism and boost local economies. For instance, the Edinburgh Fringe Festival in Scotland attracts millions of visitors annually, generating over £100 million in revenue and creating countless job opportunities. Additionally, art and culture form the bedrock of a nation’s identity and heritage. Government funding ensures the preservation and promotion of cultural treasures for future generations. The Acropolis in Athens, for example, exemplifies how government investment can safeguard historical sites, preserving their legacy while fostering educational and cultural engagement on a global scale.
In conclusion, while some may argue against funding the arts, I firmly believe that government support for cultural activities is vital for economic prosperity and the preservation of national heritage.
- Government funding - Ngân sách chính phủ.
- Pressing - Cấp bách, quan trọng.
- Government resources - Nguồn lực của chính phủ.
- Unaffordable luxury - Thứ xa xỉ không thể chi trả.
- Subjective - Chủ quan.
- Favoritism - Sự thiên vị.
- Diverse - Đa dạng.
- Controversial - Gây tranh cãi.
- Bedrock - Nền tảng cơ bản.
- Legacy - Di sản.
Các khóa học IELTS online 1 kèm 1 - 100% cam kết đạt target 6.0 - 7.0 - 8.0 - Đảm bảo đầu ra - Thi không đạt, học lại FREE
