Bên cạnh HƯỚNG DẪN TỪ A ĐẾN Z CÁCH PHÂN TÍCH TASK 2 ĐỀ THI THẬT NGÀY 30/5/2020 IELTS WRITING VIỆT NAM (kèm bài được sửa của học sinh đạt 6.5 đi thi thật), IELTS TUTOR hướng dẫn kĩ Viết bài IELTS WRITING có cách dòng không?
I. Kiến thức liên quan
II. Cách viết counter argument trong dạng opinion essay cách viết totally
Đề bài: Should the government regulate the fast food industry in the same way that regulates the drug, alcohol, and tobacco industries?
1. Cách viết totally (không có counter argument)
In recent years, there has been growing debate over whether the fast food industry should be managed as strictly as industries dealing with drugs, alcohol, and tobacco. In my opinion, the government should indeed impose stronger policies on fast food due to its substantial health and environmental risks.
Firstly, the environmental impact of fast food is significant, warranting stricter regulation. In fact, fast food chains produce enormous amounts of plastic waste, including bags, straws, and cups, which contribute heavily to pollution. Therefore, with millions of fast food meals consumed daily, the waste generated is substantial and largely non-recyclable, causing water pollution, soil erosion, and even air contamination. For instance, developed nations like the United States see vast amounts of plastic waste linked directly to the fast food industry. Such unchecked pollution harms ecosystems and communities alike, underscoring the need for government intervention.
Secondly, fast food poses health risks comparable to those associated with tobacco and alcohol. As a matter of fact, like these substances, fast food can be addictive due to high sugar, salt, and fat content, which increases the likelihood of overconsumption. This addiction to unhealthy food leads to serious health conditions like obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, which are responsible for millions of deaths globally. Just as addiction to tobacco and alcohol fuels public health crises, so does fast food’s addictive nature, placing a burden on healthcare systems and leading to increased mortality rates. Given these similarities, regulating fast food in a manner similar to drugs and alcohol is justified.
In conclusion, the government ought to implement stricter regulations on fast food because of its significant health and environmental hazards.
2. Cách viết totally ( có counter argument)
In recent years, the question of whether the government should regulate the fast-food industry as strictly as it does the drug, alcohol, and tobacco sectors has sparked considerable debate. I believe that the negative effects of fast food on the environment and public health warrant similar regulatory measures.
Firstly, the fast-food industry has a detrimental impact on the environment by generating large amounts of non-recyclable waste, which contributes to pollution and environmental damage. For instance, many fast-food chains use single-use plastic items like straws, cups, and wrappers, which often end up in landfills or the ocean, taking hundreds of years to decompose. For example, fast-food chains like KFC and Burger King have been criticized for their extensive use of polystyrene foam containers, which are not biodegradable and release harmful chemicals when broken down in the environment.
Secondly, fast food endangers public health, underscoring the need for government intervention. In fact, fast foods are often high in sugar, fat, and sodium, contributing to obesity, diabetes, and other long-term health issues in frequent consumers, and these risks are comparable to those associated with alcohol, drugs, and tobacco, which are linked to serious diseases such as cancer. Although fast food may be a convenient option for busy individuals by reducing meal preparation time, this perspective overlooks the significant health risks it poses, which place a heavy burden on healthcare systems and drive up insurance costs. Ultimately, the expenses linked to addressing these health issues far outweigh the temporary convenience that fast food provides --> đoạn counter argument
In conclusion, while fast food may offer convenience, its adverse effects on health and the environment support the need for government regulation similar to that applied to other harmful industries.
Các khóa học IELTS online 1 kèm 1 - 100% cam kết đạt target 6.0 - 7.0 - 8.0 - Đảm bảo đầu ra - Thi không đạt, học lại FREE
>> Thành tích học sinh IELTS TUTOR với hàng ngàn feedback được cập nhật hàng ngày
